Skip to content


You currently have no items in your basket.

Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein (LBP) as an Indicator of Disease States in Multiple Species

Lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) is a 58-kD glycoprotein involved in the acute-phase immunologic response to Gram-negative bacterial infections. It binds with high affinity to the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which Gram-negative bacteria express on their outer membrane. The presence of LBP in blood and bodily fluids is an indicator of bacterial infection, and as such is a useful marker of a number of disease states in humans, cows, mice and other animals. As a method of detecting this important acute-phase protein, ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) offers specificity and reliable quantitation of the protein levels in samples such as blood, serum, lavage fluid, or milk. The Cell Sciences® Multispecies LBP ELISA kit maintains specificity for human LBP, while also providing flexibility to assess a broad range of LBP homologs in other species.

LPS/LBP/CD14 pathway
LPS-binding protein (LBP) is mainly produced by the liver as part of the innate immune response to infection or damage involving exposure to Gram-negative bacteria (1). LBP binds lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 1). LPS is highly inflammatory and is found in the blood or other bodily fluids when shed as a result of damage to the bacterial cells. It is composed of carbohydrate “O-antigens,” core oligosaccharides, and Lipid A, which is both highly immunogenic and hydrophobic (2, 3).

LBP binds via the lipid A portion of the molecule with high affinity, and can bind multimers of LPS, which aggregate due to the hydrophobic nature of lipid A (4). LBP can then transfer monomers of LPS to CD14 (3, 4; Fig. 2a). The CD14 molecule exists either as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored membrane protein on monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells, or as a soluble protein which, when bound to LPS, can activate CD14-deficient cells (4, 5; Fig. 2b). Once LPS has been transferred to CD14, the immune cell detects LPS via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4):MD2 complex, resulting in signaling through a number of possible pathways (3, 6). The biological activity of LBP is complicated. Low concentrations of LBP can bind LPS and mediate the recognition of this bacterial product by way of the CD14:TLR4:MD2 pathway on immune cells (2, 3, 6).

Depending on the concentration of LPS presented to TLR4, this could result in either a pro- or anti-inflammatory response (6). High concentrations of LBP can inhibit that same CD14:TLR:MD2 recognition (7) by dissociating LPS from CD14 (8). Furthermore, LBP has been shown to be involved in transferring LPS to lipoprotein molecules, resulting in clearance of LPS from the bloodstream (9–11). Activation of innate immune cells allows for a swift, but controlled, immune response to Gram-negative bacteria, while inhibition of that signal and clearance of LPS from the system may aid in preventing septic shock (7, 12).

Fig. 1: Cross-section of the envelope of a typical Gram-negative bacterium. LPS is a component of the outer membrane, and is itself composed of the hydrophobic Lipid A domain, a core oligosaccharide, and the polysaccharide chain(s) that make up the “O-antigen” extending from the surface of the bacterium into the extracellular space.

LBP as a marker of disease in humans
Quantification of LBP (and by proxy, LPS) levels has been useful in detection of various disease states, including many in which Gram-negative bacteria have been implicated. Traditionally, the presence of LPS in the bloodstream was an indicator of sepsis, and if the amount of LPS was large enough, the cause of septic shock. However, recent research has utilized LBP as an indicator of bacteria or bacterial products that may not be classified as sepsis. Microbial/ bacterial translocation (MT/ BT), or movement of bacteria from the lumen of the intestine through gut mucosal barriers to the bloodstream (13), is implicated in complications for various diseases. Indeed, it is currently thought that the presence of low levels of LPS, which are found in many patients with chronic diseases, are in fact contributing to a constant state of low-grade inflammation that prevents the normal healing process (6).

Research on various chronic inflammatory conditions, such as Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (14), obesity (15), and fatty-liver disease (16), have posited or positively correlated LBP levels with worsening disease states. Studies in HIV-infected patients have used LBP levels as a measure of gut damage, as well as implicating it in the ongoing activation of monocytes in that disease (17). LBP has also been used to study Parkinson’s Disease, wherein exposure to bacterial products from the gut may be the cause of neurotoxic inflammation (18).

Additionally, LBP has been studied as a marker of bacterial infections in patients with liver disease, which are associated with higher mortality rates (19). Furthermore, LBP levels have been studied in connection with predicting the outcome of treatment for lung cancer (20) and HCV (21). As a protein associated with many disease states and complications, LBP is a useful tool for clinical and research studies. 

Fig. 2a: LBP binds multimers of LPS in the blood or other bodily fluids and transfers LPS monomers to CD14 on the surface of an innate immune cell. LPS is detected at the cell’s surface by a protein complex involving CD14, MD2 and TLR4, which signals through its intracellular domain. Recognition of bacterial products such as LPS may activate innate immune cells to produce inflammatory mediators.

Fig. 2b: LBP binds multimers of LPS and transfers monomers to soluble CD14 (sCD14), which may then potentiate the recognition of LPS by cells which do not themselves express CD14 on their cell membranes.

Studying LBP as a marker of disease in animals
Over the last decade, the multispecies LBP immunoassay has facilitated study of the acute phase response to LPS in bovine models (22–25). In initial studies, investigators examined whether intra-mammary challenge with LPS could influence bovine blood and milk levels of LBP (22, 23). Increased levels of LBP were observed in circulation and milk within 12 hours after LPS challenge and maximized within 24 hours. Elevated levels of blood and milk concentrations of LBP were also detected in cows with naturally occurring mastitis (24).

Recently, studies were performed to assess acute phase protein levels in a setting of naturally occurring pneumonia in a calf feedlot (25). The study showed that measurement of LBP is associated with clinically diagnosed BRD (Bovine Respiratory Disease) under field conditions, and the levels correlate with those previously described in challenged experimental studies.


Much of the current understanding of the acute-phase immunologic response comes from measurement of LBP in plasma, serum, or bodily fluids in humans, mice, and veterinary models. The concentration of LBP is determined using a “multispecies” human ELISA kit that cross-reacts with bovine, porcine, sheep, goat, and rabbit LBP. A monoclonal antibody specific for human LBP is used for coating modular plates. The assay measures LBP in the 1.5 to 50 ng/ml range (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: The standard curve from a typical Cell Sciences® “Multispecies” ELISA kit showing a concentration range from 1.5 to 50 ng/ml

Levels of LBP in humans range from 5-15 µg/ml and the reference serum provided in the kit is approximately 10 µg/ml. Accordingly, samples must be diluted to bring concentrations into the range of the assay (Table 1). For example, a dilution of 1:800 is recommended for humans, whereas a dilution of 1:10 to 1:100 is recommended for bovine samples where the levels of LBP typically range from 0.05 – 2.5 µg/ml.

Table 1: Normal LBP Range using the Human LBP Standard

LBP and related reagents
In addition to multispecies and mouse LBP ELISAs, Cell Sciences® offers LBP monoclonal antibodies that do or do not inhibit binding of LPS to membrane-bound CD14 (Table 2). These antibodies may be paired to act as controls in assays measuring LPS activation of CD14 expressing cells. Furthermore, Cell Sciences® offers recombinant human or mouse LBP proteins that have been shown to mediate binding of LPS to membrane-bound CD14. ELISAs are also available to measure human and mouse soluble CD14, and several CD14 monoclonal antibody clones and recombinant proteins may be used study binding of LPS to CD14. Whatever your goals regarding the study of LBP, Cell Sciences® can provide you with high-quality reagents which meet your needs.

Table 2: LBP Product Family


Catalog No:



Human LBP Multispecies Reactive ELISA Kit




Mouse Anti-Human LBP Clone biG 42 mAb†


Mouse Anti-Human LBP Clone biG 48 mAb†


Mouse Anti-Human LBP Clone biG 412 mAb*


Mouse Anti-Human LBP Clone biG 43 mAb†


Rabbit Anti-Human LBP pAb


Mouse Anti-Mouse LBP Clone biG 33 mAb*


Mouse Anti-Mouse LBP Clone biG 35 mAb†


Rabbit Anti-Mouse LBP pAb


Recombinant Human LBP


Recombinant Mouse LBP

* Inhibits binding to CD14

† Does not inhibit binding to CD14


Catalog No:



Human sCD14 ELISA Kit


Mouse sCD14 ELISA Kit


Mouse Anti-Human CD14 Clone B-A8 Azide Free mAb


Mouse Anti-Human CD14 Clone biG 10 mAb


Mouse Anti-Human CD14 Clone biG 13 multispecies mAb


Mouse Anti-Mouse CD14 Clone biG 53 mAb


Recombinant Human CD14


Recombinant Mouse CD14


Recent Publications Citing Cell Sciences® LBP ELISA kit:
1. Huang C-J, Stewart JK, Shibata Y, Slusher AL, Acevedo EO. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and leptin are associated with stress-induced interleukin-6 cytokine expression ex vivo in obesity. 2015, Psychophysiology, 52: 687–694.
2. Zhou H, Hu J, Zhu Q, Yang S, Zhang Y, Gao R, Liu L, Wang Y, Zhen Q, Lv Q, Li Q. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein cannot independently predict type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nested case-control study. 2015, J Diabetes. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12281.
3. Li Z, Li W, Li N, Jiao Y, Chen D, Cui L, Hu Y, Wu H, He W. γδ T Cells Are Involved in Acute HIV Infection and Associated with AIDS Progression. 2014, PLoS ONE 9(9): e106064. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106064.
4. Schlatzer DM, Dazard JE, Ewing RM, Ilchenko S, Tomcheko SE, Eid S, Ho V, Yanik G, Chance MR, Cooke KR. Human biomarker discovery and predictive models for disease progression for idiopathic pneumonia syndrome following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. 2012, Mol Cell Proteomics. Jun;11(6):M111.015479. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015479.
5. Roth CL, Elfers CT, Figlewicz DP, Melhorn SJ, Morton GJ, Hoofnagle A, Yeh MM, Nelson JE, Kowdley KV. Vitamin D deficiency in obese rats exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and increases hepatic resistin and Toll-like receptor activation. 2012, Hepatology. Apr;55(4):1103-11. doi: 10.1002/hep.24737.
6. Zhang X, Zhao Y, Zhang M, Pang X, Xu J, Kang C, Li M, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Li X, Ning G, Zhao L. Structural changes of gut microbiota during berberine-mediated prevention of obesity and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed rats. 2012, PLoS One. 7(8):e42529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042529.
7. Idoate I, van der Ley B, Schultz L, Heller M. Acute phase proteins in naturally occurring respiratory disease of feedlot cattle. 2015, Vet Immunol Immunopathol, Vols. 163: 221-226.

1. Schumann RR, Kirschning CJ, Unbehaun A, Aberle HP, Knope HP, Lamping N, Ulevitch RJ, Herrmann F. The lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is a secretory class 1 acute-phase protein whose gene is transcriptionally activated by APRF/STAT/3 and other cytokine-inducible nuclear proteins. 1996, Mol Cell Biol, Vols. 16(7):3490-503.
2. Raetz CR, Whitfield C. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. 2002, Annu Rev Biochem., Vols. 71:635-700.
3. Park BS, Lee J-O. Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. 2013, Exp Mol Med, Vols. 45(12): e66-. doi:10.1038/ emm.2013.97.
4. Kielian TL, Blecha F. CD14 and other recognition molecules for lipopolysaccharide: a review. 1995, Immunopharmacology., Vols. 29(3):187- 205.
5. Pugin J, Schürer-Maly CC, Leturcq D, Moriarty A, Ulevitch RJ, Tobias PS. Lipopolysaccharide activation of human endothelial and epithelial cells is mediated by lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and soluble CD14. 1993, PNAS, Vols. 90(7):2744-2748.
6. Morris MC, Gilliam EA, Li L. Innate Immune Programing by Endotoxin and Its Pathological Consequences. 2014, Front Immunol, Vol. 5:680.
7. Zweigner J, Gramm HJ, Singer OC, Wegscheider K, Schumann RR. High concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in serum of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock inhibit the lipopolysaccharide response in human monocytes. 2001, Blood, Vols. 98(13):3800-8.
8. Thompson PA, Tobias PS, Viriyakosol S, Kirkland TN, Kitchens RL. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein inhibits responses to cellbound LPS. 2003, J Biol Chem., Vols. 278(31):28367-71.
9. Vreugdenhil ACE, Snoek AMP, van ‘t Veer C, Greve J-WM, Buurman WA. LPS-binding protein circulates in association with apoB-containing lipoproteins and enhances endotoxin-LDL/VLDL interaction. 2001, J Clin Invest, Vols. 107(2):225-234.
10. Vreugdenhil AC, Rousseau CH, Hartung T, Greve JW, van 't Veer C, Buurman WA. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein mediates LPS detoxification by chylomicrons. 2003, J Immunol., Vols. 170(3):1399-405.
11. Wurfel MM1, Kunitake ST, Lichenstein H, Kane JP, Wright SD. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein is carried on lipoproteins and acts as a cofactor in the neutralization of LPS. 1994, J Ex Med, Vols. 180(3):1025-1035.
12. Lamping N, R Dettmer, N W Schröder, D Pfeil, W Hallatschek, R Burger, R R Schumann. LPS-binding protein protects mice from septic shock caused by LPS or gram-negative bacteria. 1998, J Clin Invest., Vols. 101(10):2065-2071.
13. George PJ, Anuradha R, Kumar NP, Kumaraswami V, Nutman TB, Babu S. Evidence of Microbial Translocation Associated with Perturbations in T Cell and Antigen-Presenting Cell Homeostasis in Hookworm Infections. 2012, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases., Vol. 6(10): e1830.
14. Aravindhan V, Mohan V, Arunkumar N, Sandhya S, Babu S. Chronic Endotoxemia in Subjects with Type-1 Diabetes Is Seen Much before the Onset of Microvascular Complications. 2015, PLoS ONE., Vol. 10(9): e0137618.
15. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alonso M, Campos J, Vizcaino L, Loidi L, Gude F. Determinants of Serum Concentrations of Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein. 2013, PLoS ONE, Vol. 8(1): e54600.
16. Ruiz AG, Casafont F, Crespo J, Cayón A, Mayorga M, Estebanez A, Fernadez-Escalante JC, Pons-Romero F. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels and liver TNF-alpha gene expression in obese patients: evidence for the potential role of endotoxin in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. 2007, Obes Surg, Vols. 17(10):1374-80.
17. Torres B, Guardo AC, Leal L, Leon A, Lucero C, Alvarez-Martinez MJ, Martinez MJ, Vila J, Martínez-Rebollar M, González-Cordón A, Gatell JM, Plana M, García F. Protease inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a higher level of monocyte activation, bacterial translocation and inflammation. 2014, J Int AIDS Soc, Vol. 17(1):19246.
18. Pal GD, Shaikh M, Forsyth CB, Ouyang B, Keshavarzian A, Shannon KM. Abnormal lipopolysaccharide binding protein as marker of gastrointestinal inflammation in Parkinson disease. 2015, Front Neuro, Vol. 9:306.
19. Koutsounas I, Kaltsa G, Siakavellas SI, Bamias G. Markers of bacterial translocation in end-stage liver disease. 2015, World J Hepatol, Vols. 7(20):2264-2273.
20. Walker MJ, Zhou C, Backen A, Pernemalm M, Williamson AJ, Priest LJ, Koh P, Faivre-Finn C, Blackhall FH, Dive C, Whetton AD. Discovery and Validation of Predictive Biomarkers of Survival for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy: Two Proteins With Predictive Value. 2015, EBioMedicine, Vols. 2(8):839-848.
21. Nyström J, Stenkvist J, Häggblom A, Weiland O, Nowak P. Low Levels of Microbial Translocation Marker LBP Are Associated with Sustained Viral Response after Anti-HCV Treatment in HIV-1/HCV Co-Infected Patients. 2015, PLoS ONE., Vol. 10(3): e0118643.
22. Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Hare WR, Sohn EJ. Increased levels of LPS-binding protein in bovine blood and milk following bacterial lipopolysaccharide challenge. 2003, J Dairy Sci, Vols. 86: 3128-3137.
23. Vangroenweghe F, Rainard P, Paape M, Duchateau L, Burvenich C. Increase of Escherichia coli inoculum doses induces faster innate immune response in primiparous cows. 2004, J Dairy Sci, Vols. 87: 4132- 4144.
24. Zeng R, Bequette BJ, Vinyard BT, Bannerman DD. Determination of milk and blood concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in cows with naturally acquired subclinical and clinical mastitis. 2009, J Dairy Sci, Vols. 92: 980-989.
25. Idoate I, van der Ley B, Schultz L, Heller M. Acute phase proteins in naturally occurring respiratory disease of feedlot cattle. 2015, Vet Immunol Immunopathol, Vols. 163: 221-226.

We use cookies to give you the best experience of using this website. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies. Please read our Cookie Policy for more information.